Skip to main content

2017 KL SEA Games Report: Let's give credit where credit is due



1. Sports is about giving your best. Only the best are rewarded and glorified. The rest are easily forgotten.

2. Criticism is part of sports. Criticism pushes athletes, coaches and stakeholders to produce better results, to put a good performance.

3. After all, those who would win accolades and the hearts of the people through such motivation is the athlete and those around him or her - and not the critics.

4. The Malaysian athletes contributed 145 gold medals at the 2017 SEA Games held in Kuala Lumpur, enabling the host nation to be crowned the overall champions.

5. But this fact was overshadowed by numerous unsavory episodes throughout the meet, as documented by the author on Aug 31, 2017 and the Bangkok Post, among others.

6. Some 18 months following the Games, the 2017 SEA Games Report finally surfaced. The report did not provide any analysis, data or insights but for some messages, a commentary by the Malaysian Organising Committee (MASOC), team list of the participation nations and results of the events.

7. All eyes would naturally be on those responsible in the content of the book. To be fair, the content providers would have received instructions and acted on the given brief by their clients - ie MASOC.

8. It must also be noted that traditionally in such obligations, it is the client who would have the final say and provide the green light for such a project.

9. Taking that general rule into context, it would be fair to assume that the decision-makers had read through the 700-over page book and allowed it to be printed. Thus, the responsibility lies on the approving party.

10. It would also interesting to know what were the feedback provided by the stakeholders during the consultation of the book and what was the guide or theme of the book to begin with. Had it been informed publicly, perhaps that would have managed expectations.

11. Certain parties have expressed their displeasure over the book, but none have been willing to go on record.

12. It is rather unfortunate that even in this so-called era of 'Malaysia Baharu', there are those who prefer to keep silent, hoping others would highlight their true feelings.

13. This is NOT an attack on any particular individual or party. It must be made clear that some RM450 million was allocated for the Games and with the manpower seen pre- and post-Games, it is only natural to expect a decent attempt to record a historical moment of the nation.

14. As tax-payers' money is involved, it is only natural for the Games - and every aspect of it - to come under scrutiny.

15. Criticism is part and parcel of life and constructive criticism, backed with facts and justification, should be taken in good spirits to push ourselves to greater heights. Being critical does not mean being an enemy. In fact, good friends will be honest and tell their inner feelings to you. There are those who will say nice things to you but insult you behind your back.

16. It is truly hoped that data related to the Games - organisational aspects, including problems faced and solutions, tourism expenditure, athletes' performances and data/insights obtained from coaches and the sport sciences experts, among others - be compiled and revealed to enable us to better understand the lessons learnt from hosting such events. Otherwise, the same mistakes will be repeated in the future.

17. Let's give credit where credit is due. Not blindly giving credit or even worse, staying silent over something that could have been done better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Football journo's accreditation card retracted for being 'overly critical'

Four Four Two journalist Vijhay Vick's accreditation card to cover the M-League has been "retracted" by Football Malaysia LLP last night.

The letter, signed by FMLLP chief executive officer Kevin Ramalingam, stated:
"We are open to criticism by the public, however, it has been brought to FMLLP's attention that you have been overly critical of the Malaysian League and have made misleading statements and or shared misleading statements made by third parties. This is very damaging to the image of the League and the brand that we are trying to build."
It remains unclear which articles written by Vijhay are said to be "overly critical" of the Malaysian League.
Vijhay, in responding to the letter he received last night, said: 
"I was shocked (to receive the letter). I would like to know which articles of mine that are overly critical of the league."
It is best if FMLLP explained its definition of being "overly critical". 
While the bo…

Poser over national table tennis association 'RM8 million loans' to private companies

UPDATE (May 20, 2018; 3.15pm):Lawyer representing Table Tennis Association of Malaysia admitted manner in which loans amounting to RM8 million given out by association to two developers was "not right" and that his client is taking steps to terminate the contracts. He said this after attending an exco meeting at the association's office in Bukit Jalil this morning.
---
ORIGINAL POST

The Table Tennis Association of Malaysia (TTAM) has been smashed with allegations of giving out RM8 million worth of "loans" to two developers, raising eyebrows and irking at least two of its affiliates.

A police report has also been lodged over the matter.


According to a letter by the Kuala Lumpur Table Tennis Association (KLTTA), written on May 3:

i. TTAM's Financial Statement (ended March 31, 2018) presented during the 6th Exco Meeting on April 21, 2018 saw a total sum of RM8 million loans granted to two private companies - Ekal Jaya Sdn Bhd and Iktimewah Sdn Bhd (RM4 million …

New parents unhappy with Tung Shin Hospital's policy

Several new and would-be parents are crying foul over Tung Shin Hospital's policy that sees a paediatrician on call, instead of a chosen paediatrician, attending to a newborn upon delivery.
It is a talking point among parents who claim the policy by the Kuala Lumpur-based private hospital would mean paying for the services of a doctor which is not of their choice. Parents alleged the paediatrician of choice is only available after the baby is discharged.
Some of these parents have welcomed their newborn while others are anxiously waiting for the arrival of their bundle of joy. They all insist they should have the right of choice as they are paying for the services. 
For the record, the hospital's administration had put up notices of its policy at its premises. 

Upon clarification, new mothers and/or new parents were informed they will be able to see their paediatrician of choice for their babies' following check-up.
New and soon-to-be parents related their experience:
1. …