Must we stop laughing – even excessively?
As published in Malay Mail today
Comment by Frankie D’Cruz
SAY that again: Jokes should not cause excessive laughter?
Comedy
Court pair Allan Perera and Indi Nadarajah, whose trademark searing
social and political satire gets us laughing out loud, might soon be out
of work. As would other comedians.
Wait: There’s to be gender
segregation at concerts. If one took his daughter to a concert, she
would have to sit in another row. No father will accompany his child to a
performance again.
Brand Malaysia is being systematically
destroyed. The new guidelines by the Department of Islamic Development
Malaysia (Jakim) do not raise national happiness. The updated rules are a
dent to closeness.
We are supposed to create awareness of
love and affection for Malaysia to remind the people the importance of
uniting, but siege mindset seems to rule.
Let’s just zero in
on laughter and who better to comment on it than Perera: “Must Malaysia
stop laughing? What is excessive laughter? How do you judge excessive
laughter? How does laughter do harm? What decibel of laughter is
excessive?”
Perera was stumped over the Jakim’s guidelines:
“One of the greatest weapons in society is laughter. Even in times of
uncertainty, we must laugh together as family.
“The last thing
anyone should do is to take away laughter. People in the audience have
said we helped them with their pain, even if it was only during our
show. That should speak volumes for laughter.”
Perera says
everybody has a funny side. Not true. Jakim doesn’t. And it should
elaborate what it means by jokes should be “sparing”, “toe the line”,
and not make light of serious and mournful matters that lead to “extreme
laughter”.
Only those who don’t have humour in their lives
don’t indulge in laughter. Their loss. Bottom line: Who is Jakim to tell
us how we should laugh?
Why is it those who murder must die
while those who kill the spirit of Malaysia go free? Consider — gender
separation at concerts is a major knock on the diverse cultures of
Malaysia and a threat to communal interaction and democracy.
We
wonder what the Tourism Ministry thinks about a family outing for a
concert. Especially when the wife and daughter sit in another section.
Let’s not delve into Muslims and non-Muslims. It’s about secular Malaysia never becoming a developed country.
If
Putrajaya allows this, Jakim might next extend it to malls, public
transport, supermarkets and cinemas. Wouldn’t these impact non-Muslims?
We
don’t need anyone to police our ordinary daily lives and prey on our
consciousness. We want to enjoy the beauty of literature, dance and
music. We want to embrace knowledge.
It’s about respect, tolerance and trust. It’s about imparting wisdom and developing the future of Malaysia.
Song
lyrics that do not contain “goodness and pure values”, in addition to
“bringing awareness” and “leading to repentance”, are not it. It’s about
the sheer joy of entertainment and not being that unfortunate
stereotype certain quarters are trying to create.
The joke is
we are losing a sense of humour and failing to accept there’s nothing
wrong with laughing at ourselves. In an ego-littered minefield, one
misstep can forever alter the interpersonal landscape.
Dear Bro Haresh,
ReplyDeleteThank God........P.Ramlee, A.R. Tompel and Hamid Gurkha died long ago, otherwise Jakim would have made them unemployable.
Cheers
Peminat Sukan JB