HARESH SAYS: When silence is not golden
As published in Malay Mail today
HARESH SAYS
by Haresh Deol
A SENIOR official claims a senior colleague suggested to “hide or tamper” documents. On any other day, such accusations will warrant a full investigation.
But in the case of the Asian Football Confederation 
(AFC), it was a revelation that was video recorded and presumably kept 
aside. 
Malay Mail had last Saturday revealed AFC financial 
director Bryan Kuan Wee Hoong, in a video recording on July 26, 2012, 
claimed AFC general secretary Datuk Alex Soosay said “protect me” before
 suggesting “can you tamper or hide documents that relate to me”.
Kuan
 had, in the video, said the conversation between him and Soosay took 
place at the AFC House in Bukit Jalil on July 23, 2012, three days 
before former Fifa investigator Michael John Pride recorded the 
statement. This was during the 2012 audit by PriceWaterhouseCoopers 
(PwC).
Kuan refused to talk when contacted last week. Soosay vehemently denied the contents of the video. 
I
 will not go into the details of the video. Instead, I would like to 
know if Kuan had lodged a formal complaint to AFC president Sheikh 
Salman Ibrahim Al Khalifah regarding the matter.
If yes, did 
Salman take any steps to address the issue? After all, his promise, when
 made president in 2013 was to initiate reforms.
Also, shouldn’t Pride have reported it to Fifa?
The
 expose comes as delegates from football associations in Asia select 
their new committee during the elections in Manama tomorrow.
AFC
 in an email reply to the writer, said: “The AFC takes note of recent 
media allegations concerning a case dating from 2012, and is currently 
seeking to assess the veracity of these allegations.  Any new 
information will be passed on to the relevant bodies for consideration 
as appropriate.” 
Former AFC general secretary Datuk Peter 
Velappan was right to say AFC belongs to national associations in Asia, 
fans and media. The regional body has to explain what came out from the 
PwC report. Were the recommendations made by PwC followed through and 
were any action taken?
Prior to the video, those within and 
the authorities kept saying the “case is closed”. But no one could 
explained how they arrived at that decision. 
Former AFC 
financial director Amelia Gan and her husband Tony Kong Lee Toong were 
implicated in the theft of missing documents at AFC House. Kong claimed 
trial on Sept 19, 2012. On Nov 9, 2012, Kong’s lawyer Kamarul Hisham 
Kamaruddin said prosecutors decided to drop the charge but he did not 
give any reasons.
Will the Attorney-General’s Chambers explain
 why it dropped the charge against Kong? Will police now re-investigate 
the theft claims following the contents of the video?
There is
 now the presumption the PwC report was done to unseat former AFC 
president Mohammad Hammam over his alleged corrupt practices. As Hammam 
was slapped with a life ban from Fifa and quit all football related 
activities in December 2012, critics believe the report has served its 
purpose. But what about the other revelations made by PwC?
There is a lot of explaining to do. We are stakeholders and we demand answers. Silence is not an option. 
Declare, don’t deny
Lee Chong Wei’s ban officially ends tomorrow. He is one happy shuttler.
Singapore
 radio station 938Live had on Monday asked me if the backdated 
eight-month ban was a “let-off” for the former world No 1. 
I 
replied Lee went through uncertainty during the period, enough to cause 
one mental and emotional torture. Also the verdict leaves a black stain 
on his resume. 
Lee was slapped with the ban after he was 
found guilty of taking the banned substance dexamethasone. The Badminton
 World Federation Doping hearing panel, had in its extensive judgment, 
revealed on Monday: “Stressing ‘the responsibility to act without 
negligence is the personal obligation of the athlete’, the panel raised 
questions about Lee’s level of ‘anti-doping education/anti-doping 
security’, highlighting the athlete put himself at risk by ‘accepting 
cordyseps for about seven years from a private person without any 
knowledge or control regarding how the cordyceps have been treated and 
encapsulated’.”
Lee, at a press conference on Monday, said he 
took the medicine from his parent. The BWF panel, in its full judgment, 
revealed Lee has been taking cordyceps since he was 13 “because his 
mother believed it was beneficial for his health”.
Paragraph 
24 of the report read: “In around 2005, the athlete befriended the wife 
of a very influential man in Malaysia. In around 2007 or 2008, this lady
 gave the athlete some of her own supply of pure cordyceps. She purchase
 cordyceps in raw whole form and arranges for it to be powdered and 
capsulated at the same store in KL. She began to send Lee and her 
cordyceps capsules on regular basis as a gift.”
The lady, 
apparently, is a wife of a former minister. A National Sports Institute 
(NSI) nutritionist was informed about the matter but why wasn’t it 
red-flagged? Did she simply assume it was “safe” to consume? The capsule
 could have been contaminated while being manufactured and this is made 
worse as it is not from a certified pharmaceutical company. Questions 
are also being raised if the supplement has the necessary approval from 
the authorities.
Lee will want to quickly forget this episode.
 But athletes must realise the importance of sharing information and 
working with the respective support teams including NSI. 
Let’s
 not sweep this episode under the carpet. Stakeholders must work 
together and ensure our athletes know what they are consuming. They 
cannot assume. 
Perhaps a pledge by the national associations 
and federations could seal their commitment in educating our athletes, 
in order for them to understand the consequences of taking banned 
substances.
Lee is blessed he receives good support from the 
BA of Malaysia and his sponsors. Plenty has been spent, especially in 
the hiring of Mike Morgan, who represented Lee during the hearing in 
Amsterdam earlier this month. 
Perhaps Lee could repay his supporters by educating athletes about the importance of declaring what they consume. 
He could use this saga as an example, reminding our future stars that silence or ignorance is not golden.
HARESH is executive editor of Malay Mail. He can be reached at haresh@mmail.com.my or on Twitter @HareshDeol

 
 
Comments
Post a Comment